Learning from China

The story is not only about size, unfair commercial practices and intellectual property theft, as many want us to believe.

With eyes of the world currently posed over the events unfolding in Hong Kong and in the province of Xinjiang, it is worth taking an overall look at China. According to World Bank Data, forty years ago, when China’s economic modernisation began, its GDP per capita was one tenth that of Latin America and one third that of Sub Saharan Africa’s. Sixteen years later, China’s GDP per capita had caught up with Sub Saharan Africa’s and is today 6,2 times larger. It took China a bit longer, 30 years, to catch up with Latin America, but between 2017 and 2018 its per capita GDP surpassed it. Based on the forecasted growth rates, it will very quickly leave it behind.

Another way to look at the Chinese Economic miracle is by the weight of its economy relative to the world’s. Fifty years ago, China had 22 percent of the global population and produced 3 percent of the world’s goods and services. Today, with 18 percent of the world’s population, it produces 16 percent of the global GDP. This is an increase of more than 500% in two generations. Using Latin America as a benchmark, in the same period of time, LA maintained its share of the world’s population (8 percent) and increased its overall weight in the world’s economy from 6 to 7%. That is a 16% increase vs. 500%.

As the data shows, an unlucky enough individual born in extreme poverty during the last couple of decades (as 800 million people are still today), would have had much higher chances of being better off now, had he/she been born in China than in any other developing country. Freedom of expression is surely not very high on your list of priorities if you’re going hungry every day.

While the West has spent its time virtue signaling China, China has spent its own moving its hundreds of millions of poor out of poverty. And on its way, raising out of poverty as well hundreds of millions in other developing nations. Whereas many countries in the developing world profited from China’s rise to decrease inequality, the righteous West used it to increase it.

Some attribute China’s success to its sheer size. On the contrary, in recent history size seems more of a handicap than an advantage. With the exception of South Korea, all other countries that have escaped from poverty after the end of World War II have small populations: Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and Chile. If size were such an advantage, why haven’t India, Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria or Pakistan performed better?

The point is not to overlook the communist party’s abuses of human rights. The point is not to look only at that. Western civilisation needs to get rid once and for all of the centuries old “superiority complex” and admit that other cultures have lessons to teach (in any field). The West should be asking itself how China has accomplished what it has accomplished, and which policies could be copied in other emerging economies to boost their growth. The story is not only about size, unfair commercial practices and intellectual property theft, as many want us to believe.

A good example of China’s more clever policies is in the management of its financial markets and foreign direct investment (FDI). During the late 1980’s and all along the 1990s, the West’s financial institutions pushed developing nations to liberalise their financial markets. The Chinese instead were reluctant to open up their markets and instead adopted a policy of slowly letting investment in. The result was the Chinese were barely exposed to the volatility of international capital markets during the global financial crisis of 1997–1998 that started in South East Asia, but that also ravaged other developing economies like Russia, Brazil or Argentina. Fast forward to 2013–14 to what came to be known as the “tapper tantrum” (emerging markets currencies plunging after the announcements of the Federal Reserve of reducing assets purchases), and things don’t seem to have changed a bit.

In regards to FDI, by 2010, the World Bank was acknowledging “FDI policies in China have evolved alongside economic development and strengthened institutional capacity. A gradual and prudent approach has been taken in the process of liberalisation. When market institutions were not fully in place in 1980s and 1990s, China experimented with opening up to foreign investment in selected coastal cities and in special economic zones/industrial parks with a focus on attracting export-oriented manufacturing FDI.” Has this approach been advised to other developing nations?

China’s ascent has no parallel in history. Western media should not only condemn its flaws but also recognise its shrewdness. The world would be better off if its virtues were as highlighted as its wrongdoings.




David is Colombian and is based in Brussels since 2014. He is a regular contributor to the opinion makers section of The Brussels Times

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Global Import Implications of COVID-19: Social Distancing & Supplier Nearing

Expecting Payment for Work Is Not a “Free Lunch”

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS)

Redressing capitalism

The $2 trillion stimulus bill ‘is not going to be big enough’

The (almost) $10 Trillion Question ?

Financial Markets Look Ahead: Week of June 17, 2019

Let’s rethink Pleasant Street, and put it on the map.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
David Abuchar Luna

David Abuchar Luna

David is Colombian and is based in Brussels since 2014. He is a regular contributor to the opinion makers section of The Brussels Times

More from Medium

Chinese robots are gearing to conquer the world: Will they make it?


MCC Investments ‘Powering Africa’ Through Modern Energy Solutions

Invading Ukraine, Part II: The New Russian Way of War

1989. The Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan